由 admin 阅读以下段落，回答问题：
The global transition to green energy has sparked intense debate over its impact on traditional industries. Proponents argue that renewable energy sources like solar and wind will drive economic growth by creating new sectors, such as hydrogen production and smart grid technology. They highlight initiatives like China’s “multi-energy complementarity” projects, which integrate renewables with fossil fuels to reduce carbon emissions while maintaining energy security . These efforts, they claim, not only mitigate climate change but also foster innovation, with companies like Sinopec investing in hydrogen refueling stations to diversify their operations . However, critics caution that the high costs of green technologies, particularly green hydrogen, pose significant challenges. For instance, green hydrogen currently costs 2-3 times more than conventional hydrogen, making it economically unviable for industries like steel manufacturing . European steel giants like ArcelorMittal have already abandoned green hydrogen projects despite government subsidies, citing prohibitive expenses . This divide, they argue, risks exacerbating industrial decline in regions reliant on coal and gas, as seen in Germany’s steel sector, where capacity cuts and layoffs have accompanied the transition .
The passage suggests that the author’s attitude toward green energy’s impact on traditional industries is:
A. Unreservedly optimistic
B. Strongly critical
C. Objectively balanced
D. Ambiguously pessimistic
解析：
本题考查对作者态度的综合判断。关键在于识别文中的对比逻辑和隐含立场。
- 作者首先呈现支持者观点（绿色能源推动经济增长、促进创新），并以中国能源融合项目和中石化的转型为例强化其合理性。随后通过 “However” 转折引入批评者观点（绿氢成本高企、传统行业衰退），并以欧洲钢铁企业的困境为具体案例。
- 选项 C “Objectively balanced”（客观平衡）符合文中全面呈现双方论点的结构。作者未直接介入争议，而是通过事实描述展现绿色能源转型的复杂性，既肯定其潜力，也揭示现实挑战。
- 干扰项 A（乐观）和 B（批判）均片面，D（模糊悲观）缺乏依据，因文中未流露情感倾向，仅强调转型过程中的矛盾性。
答案：C